ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Letter: Dr. Seuss was example of moral progress

To reject the whole because of the worst obscures the story of his moral maturation and generates contempt rather than compassion. We should open the doors on the whole of his life.

DailyRepublicLetters.jpg
(Metro Creative)

To the Editor:

On March 2, the publisher of the Dr. Seuss books announced it was pulling six books off the market due to cultural insensitivities. March 2 was also “Read Across America Day” — a day to celebrate children’s literature on the birthday of celebrated writer, Theodor Seuss Geisel. Some school districts discouraged the reading of any Dr. Seuss books that day. And the battle over “cancel culture” went into overdrive.

In reality, the most offensive examples of Geisel’s racism stem back to cartoons drawn in the 1920s. One cartoon depicts a department store advertising the sale of high-grade n-----s. Nearby, stand rich, white men considering the purchase of silly-looking black men. The joke is that wealthy men tend to purchase things they don’t need and do them no good. These earlier cartoons are shockingly racist by anyone’s reckoning. Nothing in the recently discontinued books comes close to the vile and naked racism of Geisel’s early cartoons.

It is well known that the later mature Geisel was strongly disturbed by his earlier racism and cultural insensitivity. Some of his later work can be seen as a public apology. Many of his books shaped our childhood imagination for good. Horton reminds us that “a person’s a person no matter how small.” The Lorax conveys a message of care for the environment. “The Butter Battle Book” takes aim at the dangers of unending war. The Grinch reminds us of the true meaning of Christmas.

Dr. Seuss provides a potent, singular example of moral progress. His life’s work displays a trajectory from racial contempt to neighborly kindness. He embodied the lesson that we can all grow, fix mistakes and reinvent a better version of ourselves. To reject the whole because of the worst obscures the story of his moral maturation and generates contempt rather than compassion. We should open the doors on the whole of his life. We should read Geisel’s life compassionately and as a potent example of increasing cultural awareness and perhaps even a secular repentance. Dr. Seuss should be placed on a lampstand and not under a bushel.

ADVERTISEMENT

Joel Allen

Mitchell

Related Topics: LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
What To Read Next
I urge the city to utilize part of its budget surplus to go beyond overtime for its current workers by hiring community members on a seasonal basis who are accustomed to driving large equipment.
It is an out-of-state, private, for-profit company taking our beautiful, productive land by eminent domain for private gain by generating power to sell to the highest out of state bidder.
If the city is trying to save expenses, let them save somewhere else in the budget that doesn't affect everyone.