ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

To keep a trademark alive, House panel kills beef bill

PIERRE -- To keep a trademark alive, state lawmakers sent a beef bill to the political slaughterhouse Thursday. The House Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee decided against repealing the South Dakota Certified Beef program. Rep. Dan Ahle...

3958582+SD state capitol 5.jpg

PIERRE - To keep a trademark alive, state lawmakers sent a beef bill to the political slaughterhouse Thursday.

The House Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee decided against repealing the South Dakota Certified Beef program.

Rep. Dan Ahlers, D-Dell Rapids, asked lawmakers to save it.

That turned some heads on the committee, because he had sponsored the repealer.

His argument didn't change.

ADVERTISEMENT

"It's really been an underfunded, underutilized program," Ahlers said.

But after he introduced HB 1089, members of livestock groups suggested he wait.

He said the hope is to find a way to protect the registered trademark.

"It's been dormant for a while," acknowledged Jeremiah M. Murphy, a Rapid City lobbyist for the South Dakota Stockgrowers Association.

He said some members worried the trademark would be lost and want to look for "some creative ideas" before next year.

"It's really that simple," Murphy said.

Brenda Forman, a Pierre lobbyist for the South Dakota Cattlemen's Association, said much the same.

Cattlemen "truly appreciate" Ahlers "bringing it to the forefront," Forman said. She added they look forward to working on it.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Legislature created the certified-beef program in 2005 at the request of then-Gov. Mike Rounds and his cabinet secretary for agriculture, Larry Gabriel.

But, for a variety of reasons, the initiative never really got running.

Last year legislators on the Joint Committee on Appropriations, in their search for any extra money, swept $100,000 from the program's account. That left about $565.

Ahlers plans to work with the agriculture community over the summer. "We don't want to rush this," he said.

Related Topics: GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS
What To Read Next
"If we show we are complacent with areas like this that clearly need addressing, we’re not improving as a city,” Mitchell Republic Editor Luke Hagen said during the city council meeting discussion.
Discussion will take place during the 6 p.m. meeting on Monday at City Hall
Lawmakers have said it is likely only one is affordable at this time without cutting programs or adding other taxes or revenue streams
Members Only
Although Mitchell's rates would be increase, the proposed equitable rate structure could lessen the increased costs for residential customers' water and sewer bills.