- Member for
- 1 year 7 months
So Stephanie is running for re-election to the U.S. House of Representatives. That's the smart political move. She had a shot at the governor's race, but it would have been long odds. And running against Republican Sen. John Thune, as some Democrats apparently thought she should, would have been way long odds. It's not easy to beat the guy who beat the guy. She did the safe thing. I have no doubt that family and South Dakota and all those things figured into her decision. I also have no doubt that the odds in the other two races weighed pretty heavily.
I've been reading John Sandford novels for years, but I only thought I liked him before last weekend. That's when Parade magazine, inserted into the weekend edition of The Daily Republic, included the Minnesota author's thoughts on what's great about America.
Sarah Palin's decision to resign as governor of Alaska surprised me as much as anybody else in the country, I imagine, and I still haven't been able to figure out from all the news reports and columns and analyses just exactly why she decided to quit in midterm. I know voters aren't supposed to swap horses in the middle of the stream, or at least that's what Abe Lincoln told them back in 1864 (if the Google stuff I picked up is accurate.
Funny thing about highway needs in South Dakota. The numbers don't change much if the governor and the Legislature don't do much about the problem. One of the Legislature's summer study committees this year is looking at longrange highway needs and revenue sources.
It seems to me that many national and state political writers are a lot like those military generals who fight the last war. Fighting the last war isn't bad strategy if that war was successfully waged and if the enemy uses the same tactics the last enemy did. If the enemy adopts a totally unorthodox battle plan, it takes some creative military leadership to counter the strategy. Old strategy falls short. That is kind of how I see the business of political predicting among the media. As long as things are conventional, we're good at picking winners.
I'm not much on offering opinions -- not in any written form where anyone can read them and make sport of my lack of intelligence, facts or understanding of situations. I have lots of opinions in family discussions. You ought to wangle an invitation to a Woster reunion and hang around after supper to hear the discussion. I can share at that level. I don't usually go beyond it. I'm not the least bit comfortable doing that. My approach to news and opinion was shaped early by work with The Associated Press.
We fight a lot about open records, but there are so many open records at the state level that all the reporters at all the newspapers and broadcast stations in the state could never get through them. The fights are over records that are closed or records that officials aren't sure whether they're open or not. In those cases, I side with openness. If you can't show me that a record has to be closed, then it should be open. But all sorts of election records, education reports and studies, legislative proceedings, revenue reports and budget material are open.
Finally, there's talk of a national education policy that just might make some sense. When the federal No Child Left Behind law passed early in the George W. Bush administration, a whole lot of people took a whole lot of shots at it. No Teacher Left Standing was one of the critical comments I heard often. It will force teachers to teach to the test, others said.
OK, at this point, we're barely a year away from the party primary elections, so I can see why we're getting all excited about this Knudson fundraiser in Sioux Falls the other day. I admit it. What I know about Republican Sen. David Knudson's fundraising deal is stuff I read in some of the blogs, the War College, Mount Blogmore, like that. He raised a bunch of money and had some big-name hosts and hostesses. He also wants to be governor of South Dakota. Lt. Gov. Dennis Daugaard wants to be the next governor, too. He's been on Gov. Mike Rounds' team since just after the 2002 primary.
Before the Argus Leader offered me an early retirement package late last year, my vaguely formed plan for the future centered on 2010. I figured I'd just keep reporting news from Pierre through the 2010 Legislature. At that point, I'd be 66 and eligible for full Social Security -- and perhaps more important, Social Security that wouldn't be affected by how much other work I could do (that is to say, money I could earn).